On
May 29th, Liberal MP Scott Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand
Falls—Windsor) introduced a private members bill, bill c-516, that proposes to modify the Copyright Act to create an “artist resale right” for authors of
copyright protected works.
The resale rights (also known as a “droit de suite”)
would allow an author to be remunerated not only for the first purchase of a
copy of their work, but for every subsequent resale of that work. The droit du
suite came about at the end of the 19th century in France as a
response to a case in which the owner of a painting sold it for a hefty sum
while the artist who painted it lived in poverty.
Photo by Ranjith Krishnan |
The droit de suite is a theory that runs directly
counter to the “first sale doctrine”. This Common Law doctrine dictates that a
copyright owner’s right to remuneration is extinguished after the first sale of
a copy of a protected work. The first sale doctrine comes from the Common Law
principle that restraint on the alienation of tangible property is to be
avoided. The doctrine was first cited by the US Supreme Court in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (1908) and was later
codified in the American Copyright Act of 1909.
Today, the European Union, Australia and the
Philippines have resale rights legislation. The State of California also had a
resale right law on the books until it was struck down by the U.S. District Court (Central District of
California) on May 17, 2012. Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen found the law to be
unconstitutional because it encroached on the Federal power over interstate
commerce. This decision is currently being appealed to the 9th
Circuit Court of Appeal.
The
bill is presently in its first reading before Parliament. It proposes to grant
authors the right to capture a 5% royalty in any subsequent sales of a work
where the value of the transaction is $500 or more. This resale right is not
limited to the first subsequent sale, but to all subsequent sales of the work
while the work remains in copyright. The resale right may not be waived by the
author and is not transferable. The onus is on the seller of the work to report
and pay out the royalty. The bill mandates that royalty collection be carried
out by a collective licensing society.
One
interesting feature of the bill is that its provisions only apply to:
-
Authors who were Canadian citizens or residents at the time of the sale; and
-
Authors in other countries that offer similar resale rights to Canadian authors
in their home jurisdictions (namely the EU as mentioned above).
Though
the resale right is not transferable inter
vivos, the right is transmissible upon the death of the author. The right
passes to the person to whom it was expressly bequeathed; or, failing that, the
person to whom the copyright in the work has been bequeathed.
While
the chances of this legislation passing are slim, this initiative represents a
potential shift in Canadian copyright policy towards the EU. This proposed
change to the Copyright Act is more than likely related to the ongoing
negotiations taking place between Canada and the EU on the “Canada-EU Trade
Agreement” (CETA) in which the EU is putting pressure on Canada to once again
amend its intellectual property laws to come into line with their own.
Though
this iteration of the resale right may not pass, interested parties should keep
watch as the negotiations over CETA progress. It is quite possible that a
similar amendment may be introduced in the near future; though next time, it
may come from the government’s side of the aisle.
No comments:
Post a Comment